Discuz! Board's Archiver

tv2ei9cir6h 發表於 2013-5-30 19:27

lululemon uk in this case

he subcommittee chairman, Mr. Stupak, with me, who was legitimately conducting an oversight investigation on your company and said, if you put so many millions of dollars in a project in my congressional district, I could go to jail, and should go to jail.Now, there is no question that British Petroleum owns this lease. There is no question that British Petroleum that B.P. I m sorry. It s not British Petroleum anymore that B.P. made decisions that objective people think compromise safety. There is no question that B.P. is liable for the damages.But we have a due process system, where we go through hearings, in some cases court cases, litigation, and determine what those damages are and when those damages should be paid.So I m only speaking for myself. I m not speaking for anybody else. But I apologize. I do not want to live in a country where any time a citizen or a corporation does something that is legitimately wrong is subject to some sort of political pressure that is again, in my words,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon uk[/url], amounts to a shakedown. So I apologize.The White House responds. From Robert Gibbs:What is shameful is that Joe Barton seems to have more concern for big corporations that caused this disaster than the fishermen, small business owners and communities whose lives have been devastated by the destruction. Congressman Barton may think that a fund to compensate these Americans is a ‘tragedy’, but most Americans know that the real tragedy is what the men and women of the Gulf Coast are going through right now.  Members from both parties should repudiate his comments.Tony Hayward at the House Energy and Commerce Committee HearingThe grand Congressional inquisition of BP CEO Tony Hayward has been adjourned until 2 PM—annoyingly, members of Congress are occasionally expected to vote for things—but so far the biggest revelation has come from Republican Representative Joe Barton. As Jay Newton-Small observed over in Swampland, Barton began his opening statement this morning by apologizing to Hayward that the White House had yesterday pushed the company to establish a $20 billion escrow to compensate  victims of the oil spill:I think it is a tragedy of the first proportion that a private corporation can be subjected to what I would characterize as a shakedown, in this case, a $20 billion shakedown, with the attorney general of the United States, who is legitimately conducting a criminal investigation and has every right to do so to protect the interests of the American people, participating in what amounts to a $20 billion slush fund that s unprecedented in our nation s history, that s got no legal standing,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lululemon attire[/url], and which sets, I think, a terrible precedent for the future.It didn t take long for Democrats to jump all over Barton—White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs termed the comments shameful, and called on the Republican party to repudiate them. (Today the AP published a list of how much members of the House and Energy Committee have received from the oil and gas industry—Barton comes in at number two, with $100,470 since the beginning of 2009.) In fact, Michael Burgess of Texas, the first Republican to get a chance to question Hayward, began his interrogation by warning the BP CEO: I am not going to apologize to you. (Though he then spent much of his time complaining to the committee chairman Bart Stupak that there had been little chance so far to question the real culprits: the Obama Administraton—Stupak said that there would get to that in future hearings.)Through the first phase of the hearing, though, anyone expecting to be enlightened by Hayward s testimony—and if you did, you shouldn t have—would have been disappointing. Though in his opening remarks Hayward said that he was personally devastated by the accident and expressed contrition for the spill, he hasn t yet come close to accepting specific responsibility, on a personal or even corporate level. When Henry Waxman, Congress s Grand Inquisitor, pushed Hayward on specific problems in the engineering of the well and the lead up to Deepwater Horizon,[url=http://www.lululemononsales.com]lulu lemon gear[/url], Hayward seemed Related articles:


頁: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.0.0  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.